Matty C.:your right, money is making a mockery of the game but it was making a mockery of it years before man city had any money. Chelsea, Blackburn, Man utd have all spent big over the years.. Man city have not taken over united... so i dont know what you mean by that.. maybe your scared of a bit of competition. im not. im relishing the games. be even sweeter when we beat them. Chelsea spent 75m in the last january window....75m bloody million and it got them NOTHING. Dont worry my friend, United will be alright What do you mean by city not having any history anyway?? they were quite successful in the late 60's early 70's..... is that not history??
Good reply. I didn't actually mean that I thought that City had at this moment in time had equaled or overtaken United. I meant that, whether any of us like it or not, they have a very good chance of doing so.
I am aware that United have spent a lot of money in the past, but this was 'earnt' by success and good marketing...not simply because hugely rich people want a new toy.
City do have some history, but it pales into insignificance compared to United.
I suppose I am worried where it will end. If United do get taken over by super rich owners...our Prem will become as boring as Scotland and Spain...just a a bit fed up with where it is all heading.