mosley909:
Chronic fan:OP, all i can say is- you are still a muppet, together with those who support your comment. Anderson was the problem right? I'm sure fergie thought as much when took Ando off at 0-2, then WHAT HAPPENED??? We were totally torn apart, isn't it? Yeah! a solid proof that he was the problem.
Sorry to disagree, but sell Anderson, buy Xavi and pair him with the jogger- fletcher against this same CITY team and you would still get the same result or even worse. I'm sure you won't understand why it should be so, maybe when you grow up.
anderson was not the problem yesterday, but he somes up the teams problems, he is our best center midfielder, yet he is in no way in the same league as city's best center mid.
The questions you guys should ask is: 1) why was ando playing well when he played with Hargreaves? 2) why doesn't he always play well when playing alongside fletcher? 3) Why was he playing well alongside cleverley?
Ando can never be the problem of our midfield. Infact, our midfield is the problem of Ando if you ask me. People complain that he has not improved since joining us, yes, how can any decent player improve in MF when fletcher and Carrick is their partner for more than 80% of their games. Just how? People love to talk about Barca- they have a quintet in almost all their games running the MF show (messi, xavi, iniesta, buisquests) with a host of other very skillful players augmenting their efforts. But can you name a consistent MF two in the United team? And you expect team understanding and chemistry in MF?
Even man city has consistent MF players (de jong, toure yaya, silva). But here at united, even Jones plays in MF with Fletcher at anfailed, and the next game you expect Ando to perform miracles.
Yesterday, Ando was the only player trying to hold the midfield together while fletcher was busy running all over the place. There are so many thing a midfielder has to do in modern football than just running around. T