mark.k.:
Punisher113:
mark.k.:
Aejr:If he's replaced by someone like Mourino then I'd agree. But if someone like Moyes was to come in then I could see him having a lengthy future with the club.
But what silverware has Moyes won? Why hire someone who hasn't won trophies?
Are you expecting Everton to win the Premierleague or FA Cup or something? Obviously if he managed United he'd have a significantly higher chance of winning trophies.
Wouldn't you at least expect some trophy? Think of SAF winning things with Aberdeen? I mean there was a sign there that he could do things.
Moyes and Everton can rise to the challenge for one game per season vs Man United (most years). But what about the other 37 games? Can you see yourself being content with United coming in at 8th, 9th every year and not winning trophies?
I'd sooner take Martin O Neill who left Villa when he realised that *** Lerner only had mid-table ambitions. See where Villa are now?
Mourinho had no managerial experience when he became Porto manager, and he ended up winning the Champions League. Guardiola managed Barcelona B, not exactly the most prominent job, then became Barcelona manager and won the Champions League twice. Argueably Guardiola is still untested as most of his team was inherited, but he still won it.
Moyes has spent hardly anything over the years he has been there; yet he has managed to get them into the Champions League qualification position, keep the majority of his best players for quite a number of years (Those who left were swayed by money, which he can do nothing about at Everton) and this year it looks like he is going to finish above Liverpool and get into the Europa League. All this without spending much money is succesful when your league has had teams like Tottenham, Manchester United, Chelsea, Liverpool, Arsenal and now Manchester City. How do you think he is going to win any trophies with teams like this in the league and cups? You would need a hell of alot of luck.
Moyes hasn't had money, and sounds like your ruling him out because of that.