As cleverley has come out and said, most of injuries are due to contact rather than Andersons where he picks them up from knowwhere. Everyone on the forum has given a chance to Anderson and every year he let's us down by gettin injured, that is understandable but anyone who wants nani to leave is pretty stupid to say the least .

MCMUFC:

daza13:

It seems everyone is so quick to write off Anderson and sell Nani. Yes Anderson has been injury prone but I’m sorry with his talent and at the age of 24 he still has plenty of time on his side. He can hold the ball, can tackle, plays lovely 1 2’s and movement is from out of this world sometimes. At the beginning of the season Anderson was one of our best players before he got injured. There are players that at young ages have been injury prone but have come right with time. Look at Van Persie for example, been injury prone his whole Career at Arsenal but first Season fully fit and he finished top of the goal charts. As for Nani he is at the age now where he is going to start hitting his peak. Why sell him? Pls Pls pls answer me that question? We put all this effort into making him the player he is just so some other club can benefit from it. It makes no sense what so ever.

It's because most people on here can't think for themselves. Somebody writes off Ando so others think it's cool to do, yet these same posters praise Cleverley who is just as injury prone. Internet politics mate. Ando and Nani ain't going anywhere, both good players period

Well to be fair to Cleverley, all of his injuries have been impact injuries, don't think he's ever had a hamstring or calf go, Anderson does get a lot of muscle injuries I think due to his extra weight but to be honest, I like both of them and don't want either to go and especially don't want Nani to go!

daza13:

It seems everyone is so quick to write off Anderson and sell Nani. Yes Anderson has been injury prone but I’m sorry with his talent and at the age of 24 he still has plenty of time on his side. He can hold the ball, can tackle, plays lovely 1 2’s and movement is from out of this world sometimes. At the beginning of the season Anderson was one of our best players before he got injured. There are players that at young ages have been injury prone but have come right with time. Look at Van Persie for example, been injury prone his whole Career at Arsenal but first Season fully fit and he finished top of the goal charts. As for Nani he is at the age now where he is going to start hitting his peak. Why sell him? Pls Pls pls answer me that question? We put all this effort into making him the player he is just so some other club can benefit from it. It makes no sense what so ever.

Totally agree man.Nani is a brilliant player hes not going anywhere.He will stay and sign a new long term contract.Yes he can be abit inconsistent at times but hes the type of player that even if he has a bad game can always come up with a vital goal or assist know what i mean.Hes not going anywhere simples. As for Anderson again hes a great player and like Nani can be abit inconsistent at times but when he first joined us people seem to forget he dominated against the likes of Fabregas and Gerrard.Injury hasnt helped him at all to be fair to him but when he has played and being on a run in the first team he has been consistent and has been a very good player for us.A fully fit Anderson is a great midfielder plus hes still young aswell.I would keep both Nani and Anderson.Both are 2 very god talented players.Anderson and Cleverley last season had a brilliant partnership going on till both got injured then injury ruined their campaign not their fault just the way it is.I think people are too quick to write some of our players off when its totally unfair.

daza13:

It seems everyone is so quick to write off Anderson and sell Nani. Yes Anderson has been injury prone but I’m sorry with his talent and at the age of 24 he still has plenty of time on his side. He can hold the ball, can tackle, plays lovely 1 2’s and movement is from out of this world sometimes. At the beginning of the season Anderson was one of our best players before he got injured. There are players that at young ages have been injury prone but have come right with time. Look at Van Persie for example, been injury prone his whole Career at Arsenal but first Season fully fit and he finished top of the goal charts. As for Nani he is at the age now where he is going to start hitting his peak. Why sell him? Pls Pls pls answer me that question? We put all this effort into making him the player he is just so some other club can benefit from it. It makes no sense what so ever.

It's because most people on here can't think for themselves. Somebody writes off Ando so others think it's cool to do, yet these same posters praise Cleverley who is just as injury prone. Internet politics mate. Ando and Nani ain't going anywhere, both good players period

It seems everyone is so quick to write off Anderson and sell Nani. Yes Anderson has been injury prone but I’m sorry with his talent and at the age of 24 he still has plenty of time on his side. He can hold the ball, can tackle, plays lovely 1 2’s and movement is from out of this world sometimes. At the beginning of the season Anderson was one of our best players before he got injured. There are players that at young ages have been injury prone but have come right with time. Look at Van Persie for example, been injury prone his whole Career at Arsenal but first Season fully fit and he finished top of the goal charts. As for Nani he is at the age now where he is going to start hitting his peak. Why sell him? Pls Pls pls answer me that question? We put all this effort into making him the player he is just so some other club can benefit from it. It makes no sense what so ever.