The views expressed on this noticeboard are expressed by the fans themselves and do not necessarily reflect the views of Manchester United or any of its representatives. The viewing and posting of messages on this noticeboard is subject to the Forum Terms, which can be viewed here.
Faq
Contact Us
Sort Posts:
Previous Next
  • 25 Jun 2012 12:21 PM

    Re: who's better? STROOTMAN or M'VILA??

    NEITHER BOTH NEED TO HAVE A BIT MORE IN THEIR LOCKER FOR ME NOT SEEN MUCH OF STROOTMAN OTHER THAN WHAT ESPN SHOW DURING THE WEEK AND M VILLA WELL LETS JUST SAY I HOPE ARSENAL GET HIM TO JOIN THEIR OVERFLOWING *ANKS OF TALENT (OOPS SORRY I MEANT TO SAY RANKS OF TALENT)
    Reply
  • 25 Jun 2012 12:12 PM

    Re: who's better? STROOTMAN or M'VILA??

    What a joke, a player can have a really bad season in their divisional clubs league and have a decent performance in the Euro's so because of this they must instantly be purchased, our fans are naive, short minded and stupid. and onto the topic of the OP, M'vila has better defensive capabilities but Strootman is very diverse in his attack and can play precise passes seen over 9 games with him at PSV including their left back Jetro and both a good influential players
    Reply
  • 25 Jun 2012 12:10 PM

    Re: who's better? STROOTMAN or M'VILA??

    we already have world class, xaviesque carrick...we need no one
    Reply
  • 24 Jun 2012 7:52 PM

    Re: who's better? STROOTMAN or M'VILA??

    We need then both
    Reply
  • 24 Jun 2012 6:37 PM

    Re: who's better? STROOTMAN or M'VILA??

    De Rossi is the answer.never mind others who have been mentioned
    Reply
  • 24 Jun 2012 6:24 PM

    Re: who's better? STROOTMAN or M'VILA??

    DBYGFX:
    Brittain 10:
    Taz153:
    Brittain 10:
    cha-cha-chicharito:
    haven't seen them play that much jus wanted some opinions.
    Well I'm going to say M'Vila. They're both good players but I feel M'Vila emphasises his quality by being an established international. Strootman still hasn't got that dirty has-been Van Bommel out of the Dutch team. M'Vila for me is considerably more athletic too which is essential for box to box mids. Because of this I'd pay that little bit extra to get him, but I'd still be chuffed if we got Strootman.
    I dont have to say anything , Brittain10 stole my words.
    Sorry about that mate quite a few people have claimed I took the words from their mouth! Nice to see people agree with me.
    Yeah same here, totally agree with Brittain 10, Personally my summer would be: Powell, M'Vila, Kagawa, Herniquez and perhaps a cheeky bid for Baines and Rodriguez.
    That'd be great. However I'm almost certain an lb of sorts will come in IF Fabio and Fryers go on loan, which SAF said would happen. Henriquez would be nice but he really isn't at the forefront of my thinking- just an after thought. If we just got M'Vila that'd be 3 excellent transfers, if we could get a lb too I'd be in total ecstasy.
    It's so simple to be wise; think of something stupid to say and don't say it
    Reply
  • 24 Jun 2012 6:11 PM

    Re: who's better? STROOTMAN or M'VILA??

    Brittain 10:
    Taz153:
    Brittain 10:
    cha-cha-chicharito:
    haven't seen them play that much jus wanted some opinions.
    Well I'm going to say M'Vila. They're both good players but I feel M'Vila emphasises his quality by being an established international. Strootman still hasn't got that dirty has-been Van Bommel out of the Dutch team. M'Vila for me is considerably more athletic too which is essential for box to box mids. Because of this I'd pay that little bit extra to get him, but I'd still be chuffed if we got Strootman.
    I dont have to say anything , Brittain10 stole my words.
    Sorry about that mate quite a few people have claimed I took the words from their mouth! Nice to see people agree with me.
    Yeah same here, totally agree with Brittain 10, Personally my summer would be: Powell, M'Vila, Kagawa, Herniquez and perhaps a cheeky bid for Baines and Rodriguez.
    Reply
  • 24 Jun 2012 5:55 PM

    Re: who's better? STROOTMAN or M'VILA??

    I think M'Vila is slightly better but still not amazing. Him and Strootman are over-rated in my opinion. I think Martinez is better, and Pogba has more potential than both of them combined. Over-rated , overpriced players.
    Reply
  • 24 Jun 2012 5:24 PM

    Re: who's better? STROOTMAN or M'VILA??

    red_boyz84:
    IMO, Etienne Capoue would be a better signing. Strootman not good enough to be in Dutch team is a bit concerning but that could be down to politics? M'Vila i think will be too over priced for what he can offer us.
    Strootman not being good enough for the Dutch team was never the reason for him not playing, it was simply because they had a vulnerable Willems at LB so they decided to put De Jong in to help out defensively. No one will ever fully take Van Bommels place unless he retires due to his relation to the manager.
    Reply
  • 24 Jun 2012 4:44 PM

    Re: who's better? STROOTMAN or M'VILA??

    IMO, Etienne Capoue would be a better signing. Strootman not good enough to be in Dutch team is a bit concerning but that could be down to politics? M'Vila i think will be too over priced for what he can offer us.
    @lways a RED never Less
    Reply
  • 24 Jun 2012 4:32 PM

    Re: who's better? STROOTMAN or M'VILA??

    Brittain 10:
    Taz153:
    Brittain 10:
    cha-cha-chicharito:
    haven't seen them play that much jus wanted some opinions.
    Well I'm going to say M'Vila. They're both good players but I feel M'Vila emphasises his quality by being an established international. Strootman still hasn't got that dirty has-been Van Bommel out of the Dutch team. M'Vila for me is considerably more athletic too which is essential for box to box mids. Because of this I'd pay that little bit extra to get him, but I'd still be chuffed if we got Strootman.
    I dont have to say anything , Brittain10 stole my words.
    Sorry about that mate quite a few people have claimed I took the words from their mouth! Nice to see people agree with me.
    Id prefer Strootman but i wouldnt say no to a cheeky bid for M'Vil***
    PAUL SCHOLES Im not a man of many words but I can honestly say playing football is all I ever wanted to do
    Reply
  • 24 Jun 2012 4:26 PM

    Re: who's better? STROOTMAN or M'VILA??

    Not really who is better, they have different styles but I'd prefer Strootman.

    Strootman, has both the assets required for a solid box to box mid, strong and good in the tackle defensively and has more a creative influence will chip in with some goals too. Perfect to partner Carrick or Cleverley.

    Reply
  • 24 Jun 2012 4:17 PM

    Re: who's better? STROOTMAN or M'VILA??

    Taz153:
    Brittain 10:
    cha-cha-chicharito:
    haven't seen them play that much jus wanted some opinions.
    Well I'm going to say M'Vila. They're both good players but I feel M'Vila emphasises his quality by being an established international. Strootman still hasn't got that dirty has-been Van Bommel out of the Dutch team. M'Vila for me is considerably more athletic too which is essential for box to box mids. Because of this I'd pay that little bit extra to get him, but I'd still be chuffed if we got Strootman.
    I dont have to say anything , Brittain10 stole my words.
    Sorry about that mate quite a few people have claimed I took the words from their mouth! Nice to see people agree with me.
    It's so simple to be wise; think of something stupid to say and don't say it
    Reply
  • 24 Jun 2012 4:11 PM

    Re: who's better? STROOTMAN or M'VILA??

    Brittain 10:
    cha-cha-chicharito:
    haven't seen them play that much jus wanted some opinions.
    Well I'm going to say M'Vila. They're both good players but I feel M'Vila emphasises his quality by being an established international. Strootman still hasn't got that dirty has-been Van Bommel out of the Dutch team. M'Vila for me is considerably more athletic too which is essential for box to box mids. Because of this I'd pay that little bit extra to get him, but I'd still be chuffed if we got Strootman.
    I dont have to say anything , Brittain10 stole my words.
    what is love? Manchester United is love
    Reply
  • 24 Jun 2012 4:04 PM

    Re: who's better? STROOTMAN or M'VILA??

    cha-cha-chicharito:
    haven't seen them play that much jus wanted some opinions.
    Well I'm going to say M'Vila. They're both good players but I feel M'Vila emphasises his quality by being an established international. Strootman still hasn't got that dirty has-been Van Bommel out of the Dutch team. M'Vila for me is considerably more athletic too which is essential for box to box mids. Because of this I'd pay that little bit extra to get him, but I'd still be chuffed if we got Strootman.
    It's so simple to be wise; think of something stupid to say and don't say it
    Reply
Page 1 of 2 (16 items) 1 2 Next >