basketball has plenty of contact buddy

Nice post!

ronan99:

I agree too many times have i seen the horrible minority of this community call someone a muppet because they don't agree with that persons opinion..unconstructive comments should result in a ban. everyone is entitled to have an opinion on everything man utd including the players they like and dislike.

I don't agree on that, I once got banned on another forum for having a go at someone who said that the sport of football (soccer as he put it) was a stupid game and I should watch "real" sports like Basketball and Baseball. I then went on to tell him that he was an idiot and questioned how 2 sports that involve no contact whatsoever could be defined as "real sports". He reported me and I was banned simply because I called him an idiot. Some people just annoy you with their moronic ststements and you get caught up in the moment and lash out. I would be annoyed if in response to some idiot saying our club would be better when Sir Alex retires I would get banned from this forum, considering I consider myself a hardcore fan and that guy clearly had the memory of the goldfish, I would be very annoyed indeed. In certain cases where you simply disagree with something I agree you should not maraud someone with insults but in other cases you should. That's how idiotic trolls get people suspended in other forums.

I agree too many times have i seen the horrible minority of this community call someone a muppet because they don't agree with that persons opinion..unconstructive comments should result in a ban. everyone is entitled to have an opinion on everything man utd including the players they like and dislike.

daza13:

Stretfordender 83:

In relation to the the guys nephew that got insulted etc I'd imagine a lot of the time its kids themselves that's dishing out the insults and abuse on here. Posters/Fans on other Utd forums particularly the one therealry posts on consider this forum in general to be just a kids forum.

are you trying too imply that my nephew got insulted because he insulted someone first?

No.

Stretfordender 83:

In relation to the the guys nephew that got insulted etc I'd imagine a lot of the time its kids themselves that's dishing out the insults and abuse on here. Posters/Fans on other Utd forums particularly the one therealry posts on consider this forum in general to be just a kids forum.

are you trying too imply that my nephew got insulted because he insulted someone first?

Michael Ballard.:

The problem is alot of people take the internet too seriously. Instead of not replying to something they think is stupid they would rather ridicule and insult you, knowing there aren't any consequences becuase they're sitting behind a comptuer screen.

Stand idly by while the stupiditys reign isn't the best of ideas either. It works when everyone knows it's stupidities like when leza wang is posting but not so efficient when a normally good poster gets it wrong or when someone gets other posters to believe in ***.

But starting by explaining why it's stupid instead of jumping straight to insults wouldn't hurt though :P

IMO this is a never ending debate ...

both "sides" have good arguments ... many of us experienced some bashing ... and many of us had the moment of craziness

that's the way it is, and that's the way always will be ... at least here

but that's not the reason someone should feel attacked. we can't ALL agree on everything. thanx G we are not Borg

and all of us have a different approach, some of us will be nice explaining things, someone will go direct and send the F word. it's normal.

it's very OK to admit the "mistake" or to present better arguments than others.

yes. this forum can be better organized (never ending story too) to avoid that kind of clashes, but then this boards will be very BORING

transfer season is in full swing, there will be a lot of humor 'till the end ... try to enjoy it

take care all

In relation to the the guys nephew that got insulted etc I'd imagine a lot of the time its kids themselves that's dishing out the insults and abuse on here. Posters/Fans on other Utd forums particularly the one therealry posts on consider this forum in general to be just a kids forum.

therealry:

Sir Kones:

therealry:

Sir Kones:

therealry:

Sir Kones:

therealry:

It's a good lesson for them. Of course if they are really little kids, they should not be here without adult supervision anyways so I blame their parents

Clearly states in the forum FAQ's that the reason for "so many rules" is because the forum is open to users of all ages. I'm not at all surprised to see you peddling such rationale though.

Good thing I NEVER said it was against the rules for them to be here. Young kids (or the really little ones as I put it if you paid attention) are allowed many places according to the rules of those places, doesn't necessarily mean they should not be supervised. Not at all surprised to see you not grasping the meaning. Reading comprehension FTW!

No, but I can only quote one message at a time. In your other messages, on the same matter, you clearly imply that children, of any age, should essentially "man up" or not be on here. I think a decent person would be sympathetic to what the poster, who spoke of his young relative, was saying rather than argue with them.

Nope the "man up" phrase did not come from. I suggest you go back and actually read what I wrote again, and realize that the problem is you are trying to assume I am saying things I am not. In fact I never directly responded to the guy who mentioned his nephew, I responded to Mikael Larrsons post and in no part of that post did I say or imply kids need to "man up" (that was another poster).

And again at no time did I imply directly or indirectly that it is against the rules for kids to be here, not in the post you quoted nor in the one you couldn't.

"Man up" was an indirect quotation homeboy, not a direct one. Know the difference? Poster daza13, who mentioned his nephew's use of the site, started the chain of conversation that lead to your comments. I never said that you directly responded to him, did I? And you're lecturing me on reading comprehension.....that's rich.

But I never responded to him nor mentioned his nephew until you brought it up. When you mention I should be more sympathetic to that poster, then yeah you are acting like my reply was to him. I was responded to Mikaels comment and at not point did I even imply MAN UP. So yeah I will question your reading comprehension skills.

But good job you are doing a pretty good job at ignoring the actual conversation here and just being a WUM. So at this poiont consider us done, no point trying to discuss this with someone who will just misread what I write or say I am saying things which never even remotely appear in my posts.

Have fun with your wum.

That poster's specific comment, on his nephew, started a discussion on the general subject of treating people with decency, in light of the fact that some of them might be children. Subsequently you made statements regarding child activity on this site, including the following: "Well if they are going to get bothered about being questioned on their opinion, then posting on a discussion forum is probably something they should not be doing." That would certainly seem to imply an attitude that they should "man up" or, as you said, not be on a discussion board.

Every statement you made on the subject put the onus on the children or parents to essentially deal with whatever treatment they receive while on this site. I simply feel that a decent person would sympathize with the notion that children shouldn't be subject to humiliation and/or abuse on here.

The problem is alot of people take the internet too seriously. Instead of not replying to something they think is stupid they would rather ridicule and insult you, knowing there aren't any consequences becuase they're sitting behind a comptuer screen.

pele 10:

Cleverbeck.:

Wrong. Not everyone is entitled to an opinion, not if its a stupid opinion.

So what is this then?

Telling us we dont need a better midfielders or that Carrick is world class comparable to the likes of Paul Scholes and Xavi.. you say these things and you will have friends for life here

StewPot:

Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but others are entitled to argue/debate with them... as it is a discussion forum, it's the point of a forum- to voice opinions and create debates/discussions..... However there is a line between debating and being ignorant or acting superior with an opinion...... And in this age "debate".. what age to people think I am?

I think people can accept a debate or someone else disagreeing, what i think the major problem is and has been is people dont respect eachothers opinions enough and inturn causes arguing and users not wanting to come back on etc. I agree everyone deserves an opinion but there is ways to voice it in a proper way i think mate.

Sir Kones:

therealry:

Sir Kones:

therealry:

Sir Kones:

therealry:

It's a good lesson for them. Of course if they are really little kids, they should not be here without adult supervision anyways so I blame their parents

Clearly states in the forum FAQ's that the reason for "so many rules" is because the forum is open to users of all ages. I'm not at all surprised to see you peddling such rationale though.

Good thing I NEVER said it was against the rules for them to be here. Young kids (or the really little ones as I put it if you paid attention) are allowed many places according to the rules of those places, doesn't necessarily mean they should not be supervised. Not at all surprised to see you not grasping the meaning. Reading comprehension FTW!

No, but I can only quote one message at a time. In your other messages, on the same matter, you clearly imply that children, of any age, should essentially "man up" or not be on here. I think a decent person would be sympathetic to what the poster, who spoke of his young relative, was saying rather than argue with them.

Nope the "man up" phrase did not come from. I suggest you go back and actually read what I wrote again, and realize that the problem is you are trying to assume I am saying things I am not. In fact I never directly responded to the guy who mentioned his nephew, I responded to Mikael Larrsons post and in no part of that post did I say or imply kids need to "man up" (that was another poster).

And again at no time did I imply directly or indirectly that it is against the rules for kids to be here, not in the post you quoted nor in the one you couldn't.

"Man up" was an indirect quotation homeboy, not a direct one. Know the difference? Poster daza13, who mentioned his nephew's use of the site, started the chain of conversation that lead to your comments. I never said that you directly responded to him, did I? And you're lecturing me on reading comprehension.....that's rich.

But I never responded to him nor mentioned his nephew until you brought it up. When you mention I should be more sympathetic to that poster, then yeah you are acting like my reply was to him. I was responded to Mikaels comment and at not point did I even imply MAN UP. So yeah I will question your reading comprehension skills.

But good job you are doing a pretty good job at ignoring the actual conversation here and just being a WUM. So at this poiont consider us done, no point trying to discuss this with someone who will just misread what I write or say I am saying things which never even remotely appear in my posts.

Have fun with your wum.

Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but others are entitled to argue/debate with them... as it is a discussion forum, it's the point of a forum- to voice opinions and create debates/discussions..... However there is a line between debating and being ignorant or acting superior with an opinion...... And in this age "debate".. what age to people think I am?