We are light years behind Barcelona. Talking about buying top players is cheap. We won`t buy top players Until the debt is paid off. Read between the lines and forget the hype.

Ruben Frankish:

Taz153:

mattos000:

Taz153:

You know some will never understand that they're supporting Manchester United football club. Its much more than a club.

Can I steal this and put it as my signature? You really hit the nail on the head.

First tell me how do I put signatures.

At the top of the page there is a icon next to the log out button, click that for editing your details... that works for me!

Thanks mate.

Taz153:

mattos000:

Taz153:

You know some will never understand that they're supporting Manchester United football club. Its much more than a club.

Can I steal this and put it as my signature? You really hit the nail on the head.

First tell me how do I put signatures.

At the top of the page there is a icon next to the log out button, click that for editing your details... that works for me!

wliucci:

Ruben Frankish:

wliucci:

pele 10:

Well it surely was an opinion because you said no matter what United did wouldn´t have changed the outcome only made it worse? As to this statement hindsight is always 20/20.

sure its all opinions but some opinions have more basis than others. When you lose one game 6-1 and lose the other 1-0 and couldnt test their goalie once, surely you can see why i find it a joke when people suggest the outcome could have been different if we had this defender or if we played with another formations or some other pointless suggestions

Yet you conveniently forget that we beat them in the FA cup at their ground and also at Wembley in the Community Shield. Now I understand we were poor last year in the PL against them... that go's without saying but try looking at the bigger picture. It was two games that went wrong... this year I think it could and will be very different!

When they had an extra man for 40 minutes they beat us 6-1. We had extra man for almost the entire game and barely scraped through with a 3-2 win in a game which city actually looked better for periods with one man short. I wouldnt see that as anything positive.

charity shield game was good I admit.

For me the only game we got what we deserved against them was the 6-1... the other game we lost in the league was SAF's mistakes and in all fairness neither team deserved to win... but we lost it happens and as we all know all that matters is results. Have a little faith, I think this year will see a switch in fortunes, we deserve some luck as City got it all last year and all we got was ever more injuries. We look to be having a a much fresher and younger group coming in and I think City may just get a beating... as one things for sure when we play truly to our potential and attack them, they have never been able to stop us. The moment we get all defensive and negative with our tactics it usually bites us in the ass!

mattos000:

Taz153:

You know some will never understand that they're supporting Manchester United football club. Its much more than a club.

Can I steal this and put it as my signature? You really hit the nail on the head.

First tell me how do I put signatures.

Ruben Frankish:

wliucci:

pele 10:

Well it surely was an opinion because you said no matter what United did wouldn´t have changed the outcome only made it worse? As to this statement hindsight is always 20/20.

sure its all opinions but some opinions have more basis than others. When you lose one game 6-1 and lose the other 1-0 and couldnt test their goalie once, surely you can see why i find it a joke when people suggest the outcome could have been different if we had this defender or if we played with another formations or some other pointless suggestions

Yet you conveniently forget that we beat them in the FA cup at their ground and also at Wembley in the Community Shield. Now I understand we were poor last year in the PL against them... that go's without saying but try looking at the bigger picture. It was two games that went wrong... this year I think it could and will be very different!

When they had an extra man for 40 minutes they beat us 6-1. We had extra man for almost the entire game and barely scraped through with a 3-2 win in a game which city actually looked better for periods with one man short. I wouldnt see that as anything positive.

charity shield game was good I admit.

Michael Ballard.:

It doesn't make sense that you use injuries as an excuse when we had a full squad besides Vidic when we blew an 8 point lead. Its not like half of our squad was injured for those games and we couldn't field a strong enough starting 11 to compete. We were at full strength when Wigan beat us and when Everton snatched a 4-4 draw. We were even at full strength at the Etihad but Fergie thought it was a good idea to play Giggs and Park in midfield, Rooney up top alone and sit back for 90 minutes. Playing rubbish when it counted most and poor team selections are what costed us the league.

How come you said we were at full strength when we lost our captain vidic????...do you know the important of captain for the whole squad???For me evra not a real captain...he just wear an arm band....if you give that arm band to de gea he will do same thing that evra do...

savrang:

I don't understand why all these stupid fans keep compairing us with barcelona when we can barely compete with our main competition, city Stop posting about the answer to barcelona when we should be posting about how were supposed to beat city at the eithad next season + Kagawa in my opinion was the best player in german league last year, that game v Bayern he pretty much single - handedly beat 'em .

Because barca are still the best team in Europe, so of course comparisons will be made. Fans focusing on beating city isn't going to help us beat them.

Michael Ballard.:

It doesn't make sense that you use injuries as an excuse when we had a full squad besides Vidic when we blew an 8 point lead. Its not like half of our squad was injured for those games and we couldn't field a strong enough starting 11 to compete. We were at full strength when Wigan beat us and when Everton snatched a 4-4 draw. We were even at full strength at the Etihad but Fergie thought it was a good idea to play Giggs and Park in midfield, Rooney up top alone and sit back for 90 minutes. Playing rubbish when it counted most and poor team selections are what costed us the league.

It's all ifs and buts now and we can't change anything right. There is also some truth to what you say, the team effort and selection against City was shocking but we lost it for me not against Wigan they were fighting for their lives and at home... it was the inability to hold a lead against Everton that ultimately finished us... that and also incredible luck on City's part!

wliucci:

pele 10:

Well it surely was an opinion because you said no matter what United did wouldn´t have changed the outcome only made it worse? As to this statement hindsight is always 20/20.

sure its all opinions but some opinions have more basis than others. When you lose one game 6-1 and lose the other 1-0 and couldnt test their goalie once, surely you can see why i find it a joke when people suggest the outcome could have been different if we had this defender or if we played with another formations or some other pointless suggestions

Yet you conveniently forget that we beat them in the FA cup at their ground and also at Wembley in the Community Shield. Now I understand we were poor last year in the PL against them... that go's without saying but try looking at the bigger picture. It was two games that went wrong... this year I think it could and will be very different!

It doesn't make sense that you use injuries as an excuse when we had a full squad besides Vidic when we blew an 8 point lead. Its not like half of our squad was injured for those games and we couldn't field a strong enough starting 11 to compete. We were at full strength when Wigan beat us and when Everton snatched a 4-4 draw. We were even at full strength at the Etihad but Fergie thought it was a good idea to play Giggs and Park in midfield, Rooney up top alone and sit back for 90 minutes. Playing rubbish when it counted most and poor team selections are what costed us the league.

pele 10:

wliucci:

nemanja fikri:

I think if we have vidic, our real captain, we will never lose to blackburn, wigan and game with everton we will win it...........Imagine if man city loss Vicent kompany for whole season...do you think they will winning the league???

I dont know that's a matter of opinion but I know they would have still beaten us in those 2 games the way we played. You talk about defenders but city's midfield was light years ahead of us and thats what made the difference

tops, City didnt play tevez for almost a whole season and also lost Yaya toure for 2 monthes at african nations. Maybe if they had those players and finished the season 10 points ahead we wouldnt be looking for excuses and instead focus on adding depth to a thin squad.

Quit trying to mix apples and oranges. Kompany was suspended for three games and City droopped points. They struggled.

Tevez wasn´t out injured he was being a spoiled brat. That is big difference to being out injured.

As far as your comment about Yaya that just goes to show you what people are trying to explain to you which you refuse to accept. The right player missing in the wrong position can have a very negative effect on you clubs performance.

Some people complain about the players United buy and how they leave themselves thin in certain positions. Well look at City and Chelsea the money they have spent over the past several years and how United have so convincingly outperformed them with the exception of this past season. You said it yourself City without Kompany or Yaya struggle terribly necause they have no replacement. Chelsea finished sixth last season with all they have invested. As far as them winning the CL what do you think Roman may have done had they not?

It isn´t about beating one team in the PL it is about having the most points after 38 games.

Barcelona is a great team but don´t ever underestimate United and the greatest manager ever. A couple of different calls from referees and we may have not even faced Barca in either final?

Well said man, very well said indeed!

wliucci:

pele 10:

Well it surely was an opinion because you said no matter what United did wouldn´t have changed the outcome only made it worse? As to this statement hindsight is always 20/20.

sure its all opinions but some opinions have more basis than others. When you lose one game 6-1 and lose the other 1-0 and couldnt test their goalie once, surely you can see why i find it a joke when people suggest the outcome could have been different if we had this defender or if we played with another formations or some other pointless suggestions

Like I said hindsight is 20/20. We will never know what would have happened all we can do is speculate. That´s not an opinion that to is fact.

Michael Ballard.:

marc7united:

Matt Stevenson:

Please enlighten me as to how finishing on the same amount of points after the worst injury struck season in pl history is " barely competing".

Exactly, if we had Vidic, Fletcher etc. for the full season, we would have won the league, maybe more... we were so unlucky with injuries, had the worst luck with injuries in the league and City had the best luck. That can hardly be seen as barley competing.

We didn't lose the league because of injuries. We lost the league because they bottle it when it was in the bag with an 8 point lead.

I also can say like that.....We didn't lose the league because of they bottle it when it was in the bag with an 8 point lead...We lost the league because man city score last minute goal agaist QPR..............We all know that so many factor that cost us the league.....but the point is what is main factor that cause for all that problem???....For me the main factor is injury of our key player........this injury cause us throw away 8 point lead,...this injury cause we lost to newcasle(remember when carrick and valencia be CB n RB bcoz so many injury)....this injury cause we throw 4-2 lead with everton(with only about 5 min more, imagine if we have vidic)....this injury cause we lost to blackburn at home....and many more....but the main factor is INJURY....

pele 10:

Well it surely was an opinion because you said no matter what United did wouldn´t have changed the outcome only made it worse? As to this statement hindsight is always 20/20.

sure its all opinions but some opinions have more basis than others. When you lose one game 6-1 and lose the other 1-0 and couldnt test their goalie once, surely you can see why i find it a joke when people suggest the outcome could have been different if we had this defender or if we played with another formations or some other pointless suggestions