The views expressed on this noticeboard are expressed by the fans themselves and do not necessarily reflect the views of Manchester United or any of its representatives. The viewing and posting of messages on this noticeboard is subject to the Forum Terms, which can be viewed here.
Faq
Contact Us
Sort Posts:
Previous Next
  • 23 Mar 2012 5:05 PM

    Re: Scholes "Replacement" - Gotze can take his role (personal opinion)

    best - 7:
    gotze has the qualities to play a scholes role. iv been watching united for over40 years now. iv seen paul scholes grow up into what he is. what is gotze...a cam ....a playmaker.... a ss...........what was paul scholes at that age? the same thing.
    Big difference though. Scholes didn't cost us anything, so changing his position wasn't a gamble. Gotze will cost us near enough £40m. Do you really want us to spend £40m on Gotze, and then change his position, just because he could work out in CM? Now that is a big gambe. And what if he didn't work out in CM? It's basically wasted money, money that could've been spent on an actual CM. And if we went to sell him a few seasons later, after he hasn't worked out, his value would've dropped considerably.
    SUPPORT THE TEAM SUPPORT THE PLAYERS ALL OF THEM
    Reply
  • 23 Mar 2012 5:05 PM

    Re: Scholes "Replacement" - Gotze can take his role (personal opinion)

    FOREVER SCHOLES:
    When will idiots realise the difference between CAMS and certain players capable of playing in a two man midfield. its the same shite we got with Sneijder "oh he can convert, hes good enough". Only for his manager to come out and say that hes not good enough to play 2 man midfield.
    when will we get people on here growing up and allow others to share their opinion without pathetic name calling. .........by the looks of it never. again, i asked in my post to give a reasoned debateable answer and you have literally said what i expected. to be honest, no one is the idiot apart from you because you cannot find your own logical reason other than what is stereotypical. You should only reply to posts if you have the maturity to respnd in a debatable fashion and not make this place anymore hostile and simply jump the gun offensive than it already is. like i said, let them drop before you attempt your daily " witty " patronising comment.
    Reply
  • 23 Mar 2012 5:02 PM

    Re: Scholes "Replacement" - Gotze can take his role (personal opinion)

    Mario Gotze is a very talented young player but we are talking about replacing an ABSOLUTE GENIUS.

    Paul Scholes, in terms of ability and presence, has got to be the best midfielder I have seen playing at United. Just look at the impact he has had since coming back. He is one of those players that comes around every so often and has that special something. He cannot be replaced. There isn't a central midfielder as good as him around (except maybe Xavi and at a stretch Iniesta). I hope he stays on next year purely because it will only be positive news for us. Giggs is also in that bracket.

    Big fan of Gotze but nowhere near ready to replace the little man.

    Reply
  • 23 Mar 2012 4:41 PM

    Re: Scholes "Replacement" - Gotze can take his role (personal opinion)

    When will idiots realise the difference between CAMS and certain players capable of playing in a two man midfield. its the same shite we got with Sneijder "oh he can convert, hes good enough". Only for his manager to come out and say that hes not good enough to play 2 man midfield.
    What is the point in life if you don't at least try to do something remarkable?
    Reply
  • 23 Mar 2012 4:25 PM

    Re: Scholes "Replacement" - Gotze can take his role (personal opinion)

    You would have all read it yourselves, quote Sir Alex "Scholes is probably the best midfielder in England for the past 20 years". This means he was greater than Keane, Vieira, Lampard and many others who would have loved to be compared to him. Same applies to the future: there will be more great midfielders and United will have more great midfielders but all will be different to Scholes and if they achieve greatness it will be in a different way.
    Hindsight is 20 20
    Reply
  • 23 Mar 2012 4:03 PM

    Re: Scholes "Replacement" - Gotze can take his role (personal opinion)

    It's hard to tell but IMO Gotze would not be a Scholes replacement. When you say we have been interested in Gotze, Nasri, Ozil, Silva, Sneijder etc that may be right but IMO none of these players are like Scholes because he is unique. They are probably the next best thing to replace his creativity but none of them spread passes like Scholes. Silva, Nasri, Ozil, Hazard, Gotze etc all of these players are not Central Midfielders. The don't really have one position because they roam all over in attacking areas so they can have as much effect as possible. Gotze plays on the left wing then drifts in to create. By all means he may be able to play central midfield but he is not the solution in my opinion.
    Reply
  • 23 Mar 2012 3:55 PM

    Re: Scholes "Replacement" - Gotze can take his role (personal opinion)

    I dont think anyone can take scholes role, he is a very unique player and does things other players wouldnt even think about. Scholes has every attribute a good cm needs and he can attack and at times defend(his tackling really isnt that bad, its just when he does get them wrong they are BAD) but you are entitled to your opinion, i agree gotze would be a good player for us to have but not as a replacement for scholes, when he leaves we should move on rather than try to find someone like him because it never works out.
    Paul Scholes our midfield maestro!
    Reply
  • 23 Mar 2012 2:41 PM

    Scholes "Replacement" - Gotze can take his role (personal opinion)

    This is all we need in the summer. personally a dm such as martinez as well and all but 60million will get us this and we will see leaps and bounds in europe and even in the league.

    Il let you guys select your targets ideally

    Mine are gotze and martinez. before someone trys to say gotze cant play a cm role with their wee simple theories, really think about it. OR ATLEAST hear my points

    gotze has the qualities to play a scholes role. iv been watching united for over40 years now. iv seen paul scholes grow up into what he is. what is gotze...a cam ....a playmaker.... a ss...........what was paul scholes at that age? the same thing.

    I would finally like to point out that manchester united are interested in players such gotze nasri ozil silva sneijder for a reason. CORRECT? we dont play cam right? we wouldnt replace rooney right? which means sir alex has a plan for these types of players.....otherwise we wouldnt be interested in them correct?

    well then where would we want to play such passing creating possesive players ? lets see somewhere where they wont replace rooney or the wingers......somewhere through the middle. somewhere where they arent relied on for a trait they dont possess..........tackling winning the ball. hm.............scholes role

    Scholes has never been relied on for his tackling and covering of the defence unlike carrick or ando......but for obvious passing, creating, possession and driving into the box and goals from midfield. hm....suddenly the alleged interest of united in cams and playmakers makes sense.....

    I believe because of these points that someone like gotze can fill his role. its my personal opinion and i absolutely realise that almost all will disagree, and thats fine but before you say such things....ATLEAST comprehend my points given and explain your reasons. none of this "gotze cant play cm because he is not a cm and doesnt track back".

    Hopefully..................hopefully, a lengthy reasoned debate will open . what you lot think?

    Reply
Page 4 of 4 (53 items) < Previous 1 2 3 4