The views expressed on this noticeboard are expressed by the fans themselves and do not necessarily reflect the views of Manchester United or any of its representatives. The viewing and posting of messages on this noticeboard is subject to the Forum Terms, which can be viewed here.
Faq
Contact Us
Sort Posts:
Previous Next
  • 16 May 2012 1:03 PM

    Re: Are we just signing Kagawa because he's cheap?

    Colonial Red:
    Brittain 10:
    Jamesey:
    Wrong, you just don't want him because he isn't expensive.

    Truth is you really don't know that much about him and have judged him by his small price tag

    He is in the same bracket as Hazard in terms of how well he plays

    No mate we're only signing this Kagawa because he's cheap. It's not as if he was Dortmund's best player this season, or that he has an excellent goals and assists record in one of the toughest league's, or that all the top clubs are after him. No we just want him because he's cheap (sigh)
    lol
    Brttain, come on that's a bit of a low blow in terms of down-rating him, according to Soccernet (http://soccernet.espn.go.com/player/_/id/102139/shinji-kagawa?cc=4716) he has 17 goals and 10 assists this season
    Reply
  • 16 May 2012 10:08 AM

    Re: Are we just signing Kagawa because he's cheap?

    I think he's performances for Dortmund over the past season is reason enough for any top club to seriously look at obtaining his services. So in short - i dont think we're signing him just because he's cheap. He's a top talent who's voiced his ambition in wanting to play for us. GGMU
    Reply
  • 16 May 2012 3:18 AM

    Re: Are we just signing Kagawa because he's cheap?

    Here's an interesting post.
    PaddyG:

     Real madrid and chelsea have the right idea. The know that spending £70m on someone like Kaka is well worth it because they will make that money back in about 2 years on shirt sales and season ticket sales. And their reputation will grow abroad.

     

    So all this talk of united not having money to compete with these clubs is absolute rubbish. You need to spend money to make money. So we should go out and sign the biggest names around like Benzema and Ribery. God knows, we need them to compete with Barcelona and chelsea next season.

    and an other
    PaddyG:
    Some people will say we don't need to spend alot of money on big name players. But money can get you quality if its on the right player. Its been a while since we splashed out on a quality player. But look at Man City - They spent alot of money on Aguerro and it probably won them the league.

    These players are priced so high because they're match winners. And we don't have many match winners in our squad right now. It takes money to make money and we need a big name this summer

    Seems deep down you are all about the price tag, all you seem to really care about is how much a player costs.
    Just saying hello to my little internet stalkers
    Reply
  • 16 May 2012 3:14 AM

    Re: Are we just signing Kagawa because he's cheap?

    Actually you have not, this is my 2nd user ID, nice try though. ,

    Also, I have not twisted your words, in fact you already have said that I had understood what you were saying, you can't have it both ways. Yes we get it you made another thread saying we don't have money (and those were the words you used, so don't say I am twisting them).

    So which is it, did I understand what you were saying or did I twist your words, make up your mind will you, because otherwise you are just behaving like a muppet trying to argue out of both sides of your mouth.

    Just saying hello to my little internet stalkers
    Reply
  • 16 May 2012 2:39 AM

    Re: Are we just signing Kagawa because he's cheap?

    I've been posting here for nearly 3 years more than you. And i've come across plenty of ppl like you that have nothing to offer to this forum whatsoever. Like someone told you earlier, if you dont agree with someone, dont post a reply. And just coz someone sees things differently to you, dont call them a muppet.

    Unlike you, i have a life so im gonna finish by saying my point from the start, before you tried to twist my words.........'WE ARE SIGNING KAGAWA BECAUSE HE IS THE CHEAPER OPTION...WE WOULD NOT BE GOING FOR HIM IF HE WOULD COST £25M+'

    Reply
  • 16 May 2012 2:30 AM

    Re: Are we just signing Kagawa because he's cheap?

    And the one poster wondered why I called you a muppet. LOL
    Just saying hello to my little internet stalkers
    Reply
  • 16 May 2012 2:28 AM

    Re: Are we just signing Kagawa because he's cheap?

    PaddyG:
    therealry:
    PaddyG:
    Just goes to show, the moneys not actually there
    LOL, lots of originality there, which lets face was the real point of this thread. Talk about getting down off ones high horse. You honestly think this crude was original, just another chance to say we don't have money. Get a grip, don't be mad because everyone saw through you so easily.
    So you only see my point now after i basically had to explain it like i was talking to a 5 year old - congrats

    I pity you mate. It must make you feel pretty big, going around all day long on this forum just shooting down peoples ideas. Its not much of a life but at least its something Suppose you have to get your kicks somehow

    No I had it all along, that is why I have been laughing at this thread from the very start. So you agree the thread is not about Kagawa, but just another thread saying we have no money and therefore not at all original. In fact it has nothing to do with Kagawa and is in fact NOT asking anything that has not been asked before. I pity you that you think nobody understood this thread, in fact everyone understood it, it was just another whine about wanting more money spent on big name players, like a bunch of us said to begin with. Nice try though.
    Just saying hello to my little internet stalkers
    Reply
  • 16 May 2012 2:24 AM

    Re: Are we just signing Kagawa because he's cheap?

    If you watch Kagawa play he has a great first touch, amazing vision, and doesn't get bullied off of the ball along with great pace. With him in the midfielder he will open up defenses, making those amazing passes to Rooney. Just because he isn't going to cost much doesn't mean he isn't going to be worth it.
    Reply
  • 16 May 2012 2:23 AM

    Re: Are we just signing Kagawa because he's cheap?

    therealry:
    PaddyG:
    Just goes to show, the moneys not actually there
    LOL, lots of originality there, which lets face was the real point of this thread. Talk about getting down off ones high horse. You honestly think this crude was original, just another chance to say we don't have money. Get a grip, don't be mad because everyone saw through you so easily.
    So you only see my point now after i basically had to explain it like i was talking to a 5 year old - congrats

    I pity you mate. It must make you feel pretty big, going around all day long on this forum just shooting down peoples ideas. Its not much of a life but at least its something Suppose you have to get your kicks somehow

    Reply
  • 16 May 2012 2:19 AM

    Re: Are we just signing Kagawa because he's cheap?

    PaddyG:
    Just goes to show, the moneys not actually there
    LOL, lots of originality there, which lets face was the real point of this thread. Talk about getting down off ones high horse. You honestly think this crude was original, just another chance to say we don't have money. Get a grip, don't be mad because everyone saw through you so easily.
    Just saying hello to my little internet stalkers
    Reply
  • 16 May 2012 2:17 AM

    Re: Are we just signing Kagawa because he's cheap?

    So complaining about how much we spend is an original idea is it? LOL.
    Just saying hello to my little internet stalkers
    Reply
  • 16 May 2012 2:11 AM

    Re: Are we just signing Kagawa because he's cheap?

    Get down from your high horse mate and dont be so quick to go around judging people. How about you try come up with an original idea instead? If people didnt make threads, thered be no forum. I asked a question that hadnt been asked. No one answered it
    Reply
  • 16 May 2012 2:10 AM

    Re: Are we just signing Kagawa because he's cheap?

    Or you could have made a thread that was not so silly.
    Just saying hello to my little internet stalkers
    Reply
  • 16 May 2012 2:09 AM

    Re: Are we just signing Kagawa because he's cheap?

    therealry:
    PaddyG:
    i dont judge players on fees.
    And yet this thread exists......
    This is what this forum is all about. People get so worked up all the time and jump to conclusions. No one actually addressed what i said. I was not trying to have a discussion about the quality of the player. My question was if we would still be after him this summer if his contract wasnt running out and if he wasnt so cheap.......................

    All you had to answer was, 'yes we would still be after him if he would cost us £25m+'

    Reply
  • 16 May 2012 2:08 AM

    Re: Are we just signing Kagawa because he's cheap?

    calojerocampbell:
    therealry, don't call him a muppet. However much you you don't agree with him, just day so and make your point.
    I call them as I see them.....and he sir is a muppet, lol.
    Just saying hello to my little internet stalkers
    Reply
Page 3 of 5 (66 items) < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next >