The views expressed on this noticeboard are expressed by the fans themselves and do not necessarily reflect the views of Manchester United or any of its representatives. The viewing and posting of messages on this noticeboard is subject to the Forum Terms, which can be viewed here.
Faq
Contact Us
Sort Posts:
Previous Next
  • 31 May 2012 4:49 PM

    Re: can we not get so presumtuous when modric talk starts

    Locked
    Red Yankee mocked suicide here:
    http://community.manutd.com/forums/p/189492/1693492.aspx#1693492
    So apparently he was hacked and now goes by "therealry".

    He has been harassing newer users and locking posts so now we do it.

    Red Yankee mocked suicide here:
    http://community.manutd.com/forums/p/189492/1693492.aspx#1693492
    So he was hacked and now goes by "therealry".

    He has been harassing newer users and locking posts so now we do it.

    Reply
  • 31 May 2012 4:31 PM

    Re: can we not get so presumtuous when modric talk starts

    fergo93:
    Modric is the same sort of player as Scholes. Why would we spend 40m on a 27 year old when Scholes has resigned for another season. If we buy anyone it'll be a CAM (Kagawa), a young striker (to replace Berba and Owen) and a fullbacl (Baines or Clyne).
    Agree. Gill already said Berbatov was the last of his kind. No more big money for over-25 player. If United do want to sign Modric, I'll be cursing them. Talking about no value in the market, eh
    Reply
  • 31 May 2012 12:52 PM

    Re: can we not get so presumtuous when modric talk starts

    Modric is the same sort of player as Scholes. Why would we spend 40m on a 27 year old when Scholes has resigned for another season. If we buy anyone it'll be a CAM (Kagawa), a young striker (to replace Berba and Owen) and a fullbacl (Baines or Clyne).
    PAUL SCHOLES Im not a man of many words but I can honestly say playing football is all I ever wanted to do
    Reply
  • 31 May 2012 12:26 PM

    Re: can we not get so presumtuous when modric talk starts

    I honestly think half of the united fans want us to sign 6 more wingers based on name alone., if these bum crumpets were incharge of our transfers we would have no cover in defence 12 strikers 23 wingers and kaka
    Reply
  • 31 May 2012 12:07 PM

    Re: can we not get so presumtuous when modric talk starts

    bevninja:

    You may have already jumped the gun on presumptions there, as we don't even know there are going to be any talks at all anyway.

    lol this
    Reply
  • 30 May 2012 8:07 PM

    Re: can we not get so presumtuous when modric talk starts

    Locked
    iam_kramer:
    this locking posts game seems very childish. why are we all doing this?
    You got that right.

    P.S. therealry locks posts so I lock them too.

    Reply
  • 30 May 2012 7:20 PM

    Re: can we not get so presumtuous when modric talk starts

    this locking posts game seems very childish. why are we all doing this?
    Reply
  • 30 May 2012 7:15 PM

    Re: can we not get so presumtuous when modric talk starts

    Locked
    mark.k.:
    jasper99:
    mark.k.:
    jasper99:
    mark.k.:
    You're asking a bit much there man!

    Modric is a midfielder and would actually fit Uniteds needs so his transfer would be sensible.

    It's only the nonsense prospects like Hazard that get all the hype cause he plays mainly on the wing where united have no players at the moment. That is apart from ..........Giggs and Park who should retire and Nani who is inconsistent, Young who should be released for being a diving cheat (or maybe sold to Barcelona) and Antonio Valencia who has no left foot.

    So don't expect many complaints if Modric isn't signed.

    didnt imply it wouldnt be a sensible transfer,of course it would,,just hope fans have evolved and subsequently will not include unsigned players in future squads,presuming that the player automatically comes to us as soon as a link is mentioned,as for nani,,he top drawer for me,,would like to see AV kick wi his left tho,,and youngs goin nowhere my friend,he too valuable to our cause,pens aside!!
    Just trying some sarcasm there, didn't mean any if that.
    sorry man,,didnt get it,or more like,couldnt see it,,time for a livener i think!!!
    Some of the famous old number 7 should help out (not referring to George Best).
    What do you mean?

    P.S. therealry locks posts so I lock them too.

    Reply
  • 30 May 2012 6:17 PM

    Re: can we not get so presumtuous when modric talk starts

    jasper99:
    mark.k.:
    jasper99:
    mark.k.:
    You're asking a bit much there man!

    Modric is a midfielder and would actually fit Uniteds needs so his transfer would be sensible.

    It's only the nonsense prospects like Hazard that get all the hype cause he plays mainly on the wing where united have no players at the moment. That is apart from ..........Giggs and Park who should retire and Nani who is inconsistent, Young who should be released for being a diving cheat (or maybe sold to Barcelona) and Antonio Valencia who has no left foot.

    So don't expect many complaints if Modric isn't signed.

    didnt imply it wouldnt be a sensible transfer,of course it would,,just hope fans have evolved and subsequently will not include unsigned players in future squads,presuming that the player automatically comes to us as soon as a link is mentioned,as for nani,,he top drawer for me,,would like to see AV kick wi his left tho,,and youngs goin nowhere my friend,he too valuable to our cause,pens aside!!
    Just trying some sarcasm there, didn't mean any if that.
    sorry man,,didnt get it,or more like,couldnt see it,,time for a livener i think!!!
    Some of the famous old number 7 should help out (not referring to George Best).
    Hindsight is 20 20
    Reply
  • 30 May 2012 6:11 PM

    Re: can we not get so presumtuous when modric talk starts

    mark.k.:
    jasper99:
    mark.k.:
    You're asking a bit much there man!

    Modric is a midfielder and would actually fit Uniteds needs so his transfer would be sensible.

    It's only the nonsense prospects like Hazard that get all the hype cause he plays mainly on the wing where united have no players at the moment. That is apart from ..........Giggs and Park who should retire and Nani who is inconsistent, Young who should be released for being a diving cheat (or maybe sold to Barcelona) and Antonio Valencia who has no left foot.

    So don't expect many complaints if Modric isn't signed.

    didnt imply it wouldnt be a sensible transfer,of course it would,,just hope fans have evolved and subsequently will not include unsigned players in future squads,presuming that the player automatically comes to us as soon as a link is mentioned,as for nani,,he top drawer for me,,would like to see AV kick wi his left tho,,and youngs goin nowhere my friend,he too valuable to our cause,pens aside!!
    Just trying some sarcasm there, didn't mean any if that.
    sorry man,,didnt get it,or more like,couldnt see it,,time for a livener i think!!!
    remembering games daisy chains and laughs got to keep the looneys on the path
    Reply
  • 30 May 2012 5:59 PM

    Re: can we not get so presumtuous when modric talk starts

    If it becomes a hot rumour, then people will assume things about the rumours they are reading. Many who have been burned by jumping the gun on the rumours, will do so once again.
    Just saying hello to my little internet stalkers
    Reply
  • 30 May 2012 5:59 PM

    Re: can we not get so presumtuous when modric talk starts

    jasper99:
    mark.k.:
    You're asking a bit much there man!

    Modric is a midfielder and would actually fit Uniteds needs so his transfer would be sensible.

    It's only the nonsense prospects like Hazard that get all the hype cause he plays mainly on the wing where united have no players at the moment. That is apart from ..........Giggs and Park who should retire and Nani who is inconsistent, Young who should be released for being a diving cheat (or maybe sold to Barcelona) and Antonio Valencia who has no left foot.

    So don't expect many complaints if Modric isn't signed.

    didnt imply it wouldnt be a sensible transfer,of course it would,,just hope fans have evolved and subsequently will not include unsigned players in future squads,presuming that the player automatically comes to us as soon as a link is mentioned,as for nani,,he top drawer for me,,would like to see AV kick wi his left tho,,and youngs goin nowhere my friend,he too valuable to our cause,pens aside!!
    Just trying some sarcasm there, didn't mean any if that.
    Hindsight is 20 20
    Reply
  • 30 May 2012 5:52 PM

    Re: can we not get so presumtuous when modric talk starts

    bevninja:

    You may have already jumped the gun on presumptions there, as we don't even know there are going to be any talks at all anyway.

    watch this space bevninja!!
    remembering games daisy chains and laughs got to keep the looneys on the path
    Reply
  • 30 May 2012 5:50 PM

    Re: can we not get so presumtuous when modric talk starts

    mark.k.:
    You're asking a bit much there man!

    Modric is a midfielder and would actually fit Uniteds needs so his transfer would be sensible.

    It's only the nonsense prospects like Hazard that get all the hype cause he plays mainly on the wing where united have no players at the moment. That is apart from ..........Giggs and Park who should retire and Nani who is inconsistent, Young who should be released for being a diving cheat (or maybe sold to Barcelona) and Antonio Valencia who has no left foot.

    So don't expect many complaints if Modric isn't signed.

    didnt imply it wouldnt be a sensible transfer,of course it would,,just hope fans have evolved and subsequently will not include unsigned players in future squads,presuming that the player automatically comes to us as soon as a link is mentioned,as for nani,,he top drawer for me,,would like to see AV kick wi his left tho,,and youngs goin nowhere my friend,he too valuable to our cause,pens aside!!
    remembering games daisy chains and laughs got to keep the looneys on the path
    Reply
  • 30 May 2012 5:45 PM

    Re: can we not get so presumtuous when modric talk starts

    WELL hazard's transfer to Chelsea will surely reduce their interest in modric, they were really the only club in the running for him last season and its where he had his heart set on. Good luck and fair play Chelsea and if they go for him and land him but i cant see it been a strategic signing after them buying hazard, and before these 2 or anyone else for that matter were to go to chelsea, there was a squad there that won the CL.
    I pulled into Nazareth was feeling about half past dead I just need some place where I can lay my head Hay mister can you tell me where a man might find a bed
    Reply
Page 1 of 2 (18 items) 1 2 Next >